Thursday, February 18, 2010

Mona by Maria

Arenas employs magic realism by using a series of different binaries to tell the story of Mona. The two most obvious binaries are between men/women and past/present; all the while making it difficult to distinguish what is real from what is imaginary –the essential characteristic of magic realism. From the beginning it is brought to our attention that this story is being told from the perspective of the story teller, Ramon Fernandez, and therefore we know that we are about to read a tale based on what he believes is real. This one-sided perspective is an automatic indicator that this story may have magical realistic components.
Ramon’s descriptions of Elisa are misleading because he goes back and forth between describing her as having very feminine features and then having masculine features; therefore introducing the binary of female/male. Throughout the story he even makes the reader question his gender identity. When he first lays eyes on her he describes her as being absolutely fascinating and extraordinary. Then, he points out that when she speaks she goes from speaking like a lady to speaking more like a man: “…she would being a word in a very soft, feminine tone and end it in a heave voice, almost masculine” (pg 38.) Then, she exemplified behaviors that are often associated with men such as having superior mechanical skills compared to Ramon (pg 40) and how knowledgeable she was regarding architecture and history (pg 42). Every now and then Arenas makes it a point to emphasize her feminine traits as if the author is trying to remind us that Elisa is, indeed a female. For example when he compares her to other women in bed saying that she “was hard to please…(what woman isn’t!)” (pg 43). This alludes to the Arenas’ homosexuality, because through this statement, and others like it, one can infer that he is insecure about his attraction to men. It almost seems as though a lot of why he is attracted to Elisa are due to her more masculine traits but he tries to convince us that he really does like women since that is the norm and what is ‘politically correct.’
The binary between reality and fantasy is present throughout the story and is intertwined with the binary of past and present. Throughout this novella one cannot help but wonder whether Elisa is actually present or if she is just a figure of Ramon’s imagination. He describes her as being extraordinary which leads one to think that perhaps she is just a dream. He follows her one day to see where she goes after they sleep together at night: he sees her go into the Metropolitan Museum and then literally he claims that, “in front of my eyes, she disappeared” (pg 47). In reality people cannot just disappear. Here, Arenas employs magic realism by taking a realistic figure, Elisa, and putting her in an unrealistic situation. In fact, he even goes on to say that “there was a relationship between Elisa and that building” (pg 49) which is unrealistic – how can a human being be in any sort of relationship with a lifeless object? After much investigation he realizes that she disappears into a painting. Here, Arenas blends past and present. The painting that she becomes a part of was a product of Leonardo da Vinci, painted in 1505. Here Arenas attempts to link a product of the past, which seems perfectly beautiful, to the twisted reality of his present. One might interpret this as his frustration with his homosexuality coming though. He has to keep his sex life with Elisa a secret otherwise it wouldn’t be accepted or believed by anyone much like in reality he had to keep his homosexuality a secret since it was not acceptable within the society in which he lived in. He looks at her in the painting and everything seems perfect, timeless, and indestructible; I would imagine this is how he felt about his lovers and loved ones. However, the truth about Elisa and about his sexuality was shunned by others who could not see the beauty nor feel the passion that he saw and felt for both.
Elisa and Ramon continue their secret love affair as the story goes on during which Arenas continues to point out manly features of Elisa’s attitude, such as pointing out her “ravenous appetite” (pg 54.) Finally, the truth comes out and Elisa’s identity is revealed, although, it is an identity that is confused by gender. Arenas discusses the motives behind Leonardo da Vinci’s famous ‘Mona Lisa.’ History tells us that da Vinci’s Mona Lisa was actually a self portrait which da Vinci painted of how he saw himself. This is a controversial idea considering that da Vinci was a man, but portrayed himself as a woman. Through da Vinci’s story Arenas attempts to tell his own. It is possible that he chooses Leonardo da Vinci to help him tell his tale because da Vinci was a man who was, and still is, admired and respected by so many. His’ Mona Lisa’ painting, whether there be controversial meaning behind it or not, still is one of the most famous and iconic paintings of all time. Perhaps Arenas is trying to ask for recognition from his people. He wants to be accepted and remembered, like da Vinci, regardless of his sexual orientation. Through blending the border between male and female Arenas makes a strong statement that gender should not matter; similarly, neither should one’s sexual preference.
At the very end of the story is when Arenas’ sexuality is most apparent when he describes having sexual intercourse with Elisa. However, at this point Elisa is no longer ‘Elisa’ but is now existent in the form of an older man. Ramon says that now is when he was most determined to pleasure his sex partner, more so than he had been at any earlier point in the story. So now is when we see his true sexuality come out in the way he describes the passion behind his sexual encounter with this male partner: “…in spite of my revulsion, tried to give him as much pleasure as I could, hoping he would be so exhausted he would let me go” (pg59). Ramon also explains that he tries to keep the illusion of Elisa while having sex with this ugly old man. In this context, one might interpret Elisa’s character as representing all women in society: he thinks they’re beautiful even though is not sexually attracted to them and he sometimes feels like he has to conform to society by fantasying about women, even though, his reality makes him feel differently: his reality makes him feel intimately attracted to men.

2 comments:

  1. In Mona, Arenas fuses gender and time by using a lot of gender reversals (thereby focusing on two main binaries: men/women and past/present). In society, men are traditionally more empowered than women, but in Mona, the main female character, Elisa is the more masculine, powerful figure in the relationship presented. This is obvious in the way Ramon describes Elisa’s characteristics and behaviors using both masculinity and femininity (fusing man and woman into one person). Two examples of this are when Ramon describes how Elisa speaks: “…she would begin a word in a very soft, feminine tone and end it with a heavy voice, almost masculine” (38). And then when he says that she exemplified behaviors that are often associated with men such as having superior mechanical skills compared to Ramon (40) and being knowledgeable about architecture and history (42). Describing Elisa as a masculine figure, Arenas hints at his homosexuality by describing certain features that he is attracted to, namely masculine ones. In his reality, and in the world of the story, he often has to cover up this attraction since homosexuality was not accepted in society. Even at the end of the story when Elisa’s identity is revealed, it is still confusing as to who exactly she is in terms of gender because she starts out as a woman and then transforms into an old man. Her unclear gender throughout this novella is a tactic Arenas uses to tell us that gender is irrelevant when it comes to emotions or who one falls in love with. In other words, gender simply does not matter when it comes to love as love is chemically based and driven by emotion, not based on or driven by gender.
    Arenas shows us how society views/mistreats homosexuals that he, being an open homosexual, had to face every day of life. Before Ramon sets eyes on Elisa he lives a pretty simple lifestyle, working as a Wendy’s employee. Then, he meets Elisa and falls into a trap, or labyrinth, of constantly feeling confused but yet infatuated. It is as though Arenas is trying to relay to his readers his life prior to admitting to his homosexuality and then what his life was like once he was out. Ramon’s constant feelings of confusion, anxiety and frustration with Elisa mirror Arenas’ reality in terms of how the Cuban government and society treated him and acted toward him for being homosexual. The communist government punished him by constantly threatening him and putting him in prison for being gay, but he never went against his heart and tried over and over again to live his gay lifestyle even though all of society made it difficult for him. Writings, such as this, were exactly what got Arenas in trouble, because he emphasized the unimportance of gender when it came to love. A person’s emotions are much stronger than law. Arenas did not let his homosexuality take the backseat when it came to living the life he wanted to live. Unfortunately for Arenas societal un-acceptance got to him when he chose to end his life in 1990.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The binary between past and present is also evident all throughout Mona. One day Ramon follows Elisa to see where she goes during the day and watches her go into the Metropolitan Museum. He claims that, “in front of my eyes, she disappeared” (47). In reality people cannot just disappear. Here, Arenas employs magic realism by taking a realistic figure, Elisa, and placing her in an unrealistic situation. In fact, he even goes on to say that “there was a relationship between Elisa and that building” (49). Of course it is impossible for a human being to have any sort of relationship with an inanimate object, such as a building. After much investigation he realizes that she becomes part of a painting. Here, we see Arenas blend past with present. The painting that she becomes a part of was a product of Leonardo da Vinci, painted in 1505. So, Arenas links a product of the past to a person who exists in his present.
    It is possible that Arenas chose Leonardo da Vinci to help him tell his tale because da Vinci is a man who was, and still is, admired and respected by so many. His Mona Lisa, whether there be controversial meaning behind it or not, is one of the most famous and iconic paintings of all time. Perhaps Arenas is trying to ask for recognition from his people. He wants to be accepted and remembered, like da Vinci, regardless of his sexual orientation. Using da Vinci as a key element of Mona Arenas begs his readers to see him for his artistic talent not for his sexual orientation. He wants to be remembered for his writing, as da Vinci is remembered for his art.

    ReplyDelete